How do you effectively compare items that appear distinct on the surface, like tasks, financial products, or even claims? Semantic similarity offers a way to assess and measure these differences quantitatively, enabling better decision-making across a variety of domains.

Understanding Semantic Similarity

At its core, semantic similarity transforms item descriptors (or attributes) into a vector space. Each dimension of this space represents a specific attribute, enabling mathematical similarity measurements. This approach works for virtually anything with defined attributes, from tasks to ETFs, claims, and even laptops.

To illustrate, let’s focus on tasks and use semantic similarity to compare the following:

1. Translation Services
2. Urgent Translation Task
3. Online Campaign Design
4. Content Creation

Each task is described by attributes grouped into Proficiency and Performance Measurement, giving us a structured lens to analyze similarities.

---

Attribute Groupings for Comparison

1. Proficiency
   • Spoken English Proficiency
   • Spoken French Proficiency
   • Spoken Spanish Proficiency
   For example, “Translation Services” might emphasize high proficiency in all three languages, while “Urgent Translation Task” prioritizes only English. “Content Creation” might not require language proficiency at all, focusing instead on creative skills.
2. Performance Measurement
   • Expected Revenue
   • Organization Percent Revenue Share
   • Organization Satisfaction Percentage
   These attributes quantify the business value of tasks. For example, “Online Campaign Design” may deliver a high expected revenue and organization satisfaction, while “Translation Services” might have lower immediate revenue impact but high satisfaction percentages.

Memory updated

Draft Blog Post: Semantic Similarity for Versatile Item Comparison

How do you effectively compare items that appear distinct on the surface, like tasks, financial products, or even claims? Semantic similarity offers a way to assess and measure these differences quantitatively, enabling better decision-making across a variety of domains.

Understanding Semantic Similarity

At its core, semantic similarity transforms item descriptors (or attributes) into a vector space. Each dimension of this space represents a specific attribute, enabling mathematical similarity measurements. This approach works for virtually anything with defined attributes, from tasks to ETFs, claims, and even laptops.

To illustrate, let’s focus on tasks and use semantic similarity to compare the following:

1. Translation Services
2. Urgent Translation Task
3. Online Campaign Design
4. Content Creation

Each task is described by attributes grouped into Proficiency and Performance Measurement, giving us a structured lens to analyze similarities.

Attribute Groupings for Comparison

1. Proficiency
   • Spoken English ProficiencySpoken French ProficiencySpoken Spanish Proficiency
   • • For example, “Translation Services” might emphasize high proficiency in all three languages, while “Urgent Translation Task” prioritizes only English. “Content Creation” might not require language proficiency at all, focusing instead on creative skills.
2. Performance Measurement
   • Expected RevenueOrganization Percent Revenue ShareOrganization Satisfaction Percentage
   • • These attributes quantify the business value of tasks. For example, “Online Campaign Design” may deliver a high expected revenue and organization satisfaction, while “Translation Services” might have lower immediate revenue impact but high satisfaction percentages.

Drilling into Similarity by Attribute Groups

By grouping attributes, we can analyze similarity in specific contexts:

• Proficiency Similarity: Compare tasks based on language requirements. “Translation Services” and “Urgent Translation Task” will likely score high here, while “Content Creation” scores low.
• Performance Measurement Similarity: Evaluate tasks based on their expected revenue and organizational impact. “Online Campaign Design” and “Content Creation” might show greater similarity in this group than either would to translation tasks.

This grouping approach allows deeper insight into specific facets of similarity while also contributing to the overall comparison.

Let’s see what the example looks like. At a high level you can quickly see which of the tasks is most similar to the Translation Services task that serves as the reference point:

Expanding the overall similarity score reveals the specific grouping similarity measures:

If we look specifically at the Proficiency similarity score between the most similar task when compared to our reference task we can see why they are mostly similar but with a minor difference around the French proficiency and a more significant difference with the Spanish proficiency required.

Versatility Beyond Tasks

While the example focuses on tasks, this approach applies broadly within the platform:

• ETFs: Compare portfolios by holdings composition and financial performance metrics.
• Claims: Assess claims based on coverage and payout patterns.
• Laptops: Compare based on features like battery life, performance, and price.

Semantic similarity unifies these diverse use cases by mapping attributes to a shared vector space, enabling consistent and meaningful comparisons.

Why It Matters

This method enables organizations to:

1. Drill into specific similarities for targeted analysis.
2. Handle diverse comparisons across varied domains.
3. Improve decision-making by quantifying abstract attributes.

Whether you’re grouping similar tasks, selecting ETFs, or prioritizing customer claims, semantic similarity bridges the gap between qualitative and quantitative analysis.

This approach can also serve as a foundation for bootstrapping automated decision-making by comparing the current item with previously processed examples. For instance, if several past instances are similar or identical to the task at hand, one could adopt the same outcome as those examples, avoiding the need to “reinvent the wheel.” If a different course of action is chosen, documenting the reasoning becomes crucial. This feedback can refine the task’s characterization, ensuring any nuanced requirements are accurately captured. Ultimately, previous outcomes can either be directly reused or serve as a guide for addressing the current case.

Conclusion

In a future post, I’d like to dive deeper into how that’s integrated in the platform/project I’m working on.

Curious about how semantic similarity could streamline your decision-making processes? Let me know about your challenges or goals, and we’d be happy to explore how this approach can help you make smarter, data-driven decisions!